sponsored by


Endsleigh offer competitive
Life Insurance policies

Calendar

«« Aug 2007 »»
S M T W T F S
     
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 31

Search Box


HealthCentral Top Site Award

IBS Tales Hope Award

LinkBlog

Crying Shame - a Priory Group survey about stigma and mental illness in Britain (pdf)

6 Golden Rules for Conquering Performance Anxiety by David Leisner

Freedom from Fear's On Target Summer/Fall 2007 newsletter - an anxiety & depression resource (PDF)

Switching between monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and SSRI or tricyclic antidepressants (.doc format)

  More

Contact

Mailing List

RSS Feeds








Translation

Disclaimer

All content within Anxiety Insights is provided for general information only, and should not be treated as a substitute for the medical advice of your doctor or other health care professional.

Anxiety Insights is not responsible or liable for any diagnosis made by a reader based on the content of this website.

Anxiety Insights is not liable for the contents of any external internet sites listed, nor does it endorse any commercial product or service mentioned or advised on any of the sites.

Always consult your doctor if you are in any way concerned about your health.

recommended links

Depression is Real's Down & Up Show
      Weekly audio-casts from the
      Depression Is Real Coalition


No Longer Lonely.com

"just don't smoke"


"Don't smoke, whatever you do, just don't smoke."
                        Yul Brynner

Hit Counter

Total: 834,670
since: 14 May 2006

Admin console

Log-In

My Blog    My Profile

Leave Message

Add as neighbors






Blogion.com

Blog Flux Directory



Blogarama - The Blogs Directory

blog search directory

BlogTagstic - Blog Directory

Find Blogs in the Blog Directory



LS Blogs

Top Health Sites





Health Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Bloggapedia - Find It!

Cell (mobile) phone technology doesn't cause anxiety, tension or tiredness

« H E » ZFZ :: email
posted Monday, 27 August 2007
Cell phone anxiety

One of the largest studies into the short-term health effects of mobile (cell) phone technology has found that reported symptoms such as anxiety, tension and tiredness are not caused by the typical emissions from phone masts.

The multi-disciplinary scientific research team which included cognitive psychologists, electronic and biomedical engineers and a medical doctor from the University of Essex, UK, tested 44 people who had previously reported symptoms or sensitivity to mobile phone technology, and 114 people who had not reported any health effects (controls), at a specially-designed laboratory.

The three-year study found that physiological measures such as heart rate, blood pressure and skin conductance were not affected by whether the mast was switched on or off, and did not detect any significant effects in either sensitive or control participants between GSM (conventional) exposure and no exposure.

When both sensitive and control participants were exposed to a 3G (UMTS) signal, neither the physiological measures nor the number of reported symptoms increased. However, the sensitive group did report increased levels of arousal when exposed to 3G, but further analysis suggested that this was related to the fact that a higher proportion of sensitive people received the UMTS signal during their first 50-minute testing session. All other measures did not differ between the 3G and the sham conditions.

All participants were tested in several different sessions. In open provocation tests, when both participant and experimenter knew whether the signal was on or off, sensitive individuals reported lower levels of well-being and more symptoms when the signal was on. This confirmed that the laboratory conditions did not prevent them from experiencing typical symptoms in response to mobile phone masts.

However, when tests were carried out under double-blind conditions, where neither experimenter nor participant knew whether the signal was on or off, the number of symptoms reported was not related to whether the mast was on or off. Two of the 44 sensitive individuals correctly judged whether the mast was on or off in all six tests, compared with five out of 114 control participants. This proportion is what is expected by chance and was not increased in the sensitive group.

The study found that, compared with controls, sensitive individuals reported more symptoms and greater severity of symptoms, as well as higher skin conductance (which is a good measure of physiological response to environmental stressors), regardless of whether the signal was on or off. Hence, the range of symptoms and physiological response does not appear to be related to the presence of either GSM or 3G signals.

Principal investigator Professor Elaine Fox explained: 'It is clear that sensitive individuals are suffering real symptoms and often have a poor quality of life. It is now important to determine what other factors could be causing these symptoms, so appropriate research studies and treatment strategies can be developed.'

The results are consistent with the only other published large-scale study of the effects of short-term exposure to mobile phone masts with sensitive individuals (Regel et al, 2006).

Dr James Rubin, of the Mobile Phones Research Unit at Kings College London, who has reviewed 31 blind and double-blind studies carried out under controlled laboratory conditions, said: 'The Essex study is one of the largest and most detailed of these experiments and its findings, that mobile phone signals are not responsible for the symptoms that some people describe, are in line with those from most other previous experiments. This should be reassuring news for anyone who is concerned about the possible short-term health effects of masts.'

The study was funded by the Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) program.


Eltiti S, Wallace D, Ridgewell A, et al. Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomised Provocation Study Environ Health Perspect 2007;doi:10.1289/ehp.10286   [Full study (PDF format)]

tags:  

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. Debaser left...
Monday, 27 August 2007 8:05 pm :: http://anxietypanicdisorder.blogspot.com

Well-written synopsis and interesting study. I never would have thought of cell signals as a variable on anxiety, but this almost proves that they aren't. Would like to see a slightly larger sample. Plus, do exposure to these signals over time cause greater anxiety? Harder to study, but a more likely scenario, I'd think. Interesting stuff.

By the way, your post form will not accept any of my e-mail accounts.