Calendar

«« Jan 2008 »»
S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

Search Box


HealthCentral Top Site Award

IBS Tales Hope Award

LinkBlog

'Managing Holiday Stress' a LifeCare® guide (PDF)

Generalized Anxiety Disorder - Patient treatment manual (pdf)

Understanding post-traumatic stress disorder

  More

Contact

Mailing List

RSS Feeds








Translation

Disclaimer

All content within Anxiety Insights is provided for general information only, and should not be treated as a substitute for the medical advice of your doctor or other health care professional.

Anxiety Insights is not responsible or liable for any diagnosis made by a reader based on the content of this website.

Anxiety Insights is not liable for the contents of any external internet sites listed, nor does it endorse any commercial product or service mentioned or advised on any of the sites.

Always consult your doctor if you are in any way concerned about your health.

recommended links

Depression is Real's Down & Up Show
      Weekly audio-casts from the
      Depression Is Real Coalition

we support

Kiva.org - micro loans that change lives

Moving a Nation to Care : Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and America's Returning Troops, by Ilona Meagher

No Longer Lonely.com

"just don't smoke"


"Don't smoke, whatever you do, just don't smoke."
                        Yul Brynner

Hit Counter

Total: 1,105,806
since: 14 May 2006

Admin console

Log-In

My Blog    My Profile

Leave Message

Add as neighbors






Blogion.com

Blog Flux Directory



Blogarama - The Blogs Directory

blog search directory

BlogTagstic - Blog Directory

Find Blogs in the Blog Directory



LS Blogs

Top Health Sites





Health Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Webloogle Blog Directory

Bloggapedia - Find It!

Cutting back compensation increases toxin load per cigarette

Heavy smokers who have reduced their number of daily cigarettes still experience significantly greater exposure to toxins per cigarette than light smokers, according to a new study by researchers at the University of Minnesota.

Even when smokers in the two groups smoked as few as five cigarettes a day, heavy smokers who reduced their cigarette intake experienced two to three times the amount of total toxin exposure per cigarette when compared with light smokers, researchers report in the December issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

In addition, researchers observed that the more that heavy smokers reduced their smoking, the more likely they were to increase their exposure to carcinogens per cigarette presumably because they took more frequent puffs or inhaled deeper or longer on each cigarette, a process referred to as "compensatory smoking." As a result, smokers who decreased their smoking to as little as one to three cigarettes per day experienced a four- to eight-fold increased exposure to toxins per cigarette as compared with light smokers.

Compensatory smoking occurs because smokers are trying to maintain a specific level of nicotine in their bodies, says Dorothy K. Hatsukami, Ph.D., lead author of the study and director of the University's Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center in Minneapolis. Other factors, such as the sensory aspects of smoking, also may play a role in compensatory smoking, Hatsukami says.

"These results are consistent with other studies that show that people who decrease their smoking by 50 percent or more don't experience a comparable reduction in risk for lung cancer because they tend to smoke their fewer cigarettes more intensely," she says. "The best way to lower the risk for premature death is to stop smoking altogether."

For the study, Hatsukami and colleagues compared a group of 64 people participating in two smoking reduction intervention studies and who reduced their smoking to levels similar with a group of 62 light smokers. The researchers created a mathematical formula to calculate the degree of smoking compensation in reducers compared with light smokers. As part of the formula, they measured a biological marker, total NNAL, which indicates the amount of exposure to the tobacco-specific lung cancer-causing agent NNK.

The light smokers averaged age 48, were 53 percent female and smoked an average of 5.6 cigarettes a day. The reducers averaged age 51, were 39 percent female and smoked an average 26 cigarettes per day prior to cigarette reduction. All of the reducers studied decreased their smoking by at least 40 percent and smoked five cigarettes per day within six months of enrolling in the study.

Results indicated that the average level of NNAL for reducers was more than twice that of light smokers, even when the two groups smoked about the same number of cigarettes per day. The amount of smoking reduction was shown to be a strong predictor of compensatory smoking, with greater cigarette reduction associated with more compensation.

Hatsukami says heavy smokers fare better health-wise by quitting smoking than decreasing their cigarette intake: "Although light smokers have lower levels of disease risk than heavy smokers, a low rate of smoking still confers increased risk compared to non-smokers and quitters."

In a previous study of smoking reduction using nicotine replacement therapies such as gum or patches, the researchers observed that smokers who reduced their cigarette intake by 73 percent only experienced a 30 percent reduction in carcinogens because of compensatory smoking. Another study showed that a reduction of 62 percent in tobacco consumption was associated with only a 27 percent reduction in lung cancer risk.

The research was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.


Hatsukami DK, Le CT, Zhang Y, Joseph AM, Mooney ME, Carmella SG, Hecht SS.
Toxicant Exposure in Cigarette Reducers versus Light Smokers.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Dec;15(12):2355-8. · [Abstract]
Caution:  
Not only is continuing to smoke a bad idea for the obvious reason, that it increases the risk of developing lung cancer, but nicotine speeds up tumor growth by promoting cell division and blood vessel formation (angiogenesis) and also inhibits the action of chemo therapy drugs (Dasgupta et al, 2006)!